<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACT NOW: Postpone the Vote on the E-Transactions Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smex.org/2010/06/act-now-postpone-the-vote-on-the-e-transactions-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smex.org/2010/06/act-now-postpone-the-vote-on-the-e-transactions-law/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:29:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Lebanon: E-transactions Draft Law Postponed :: Elites TV</title>
		<link>http://www.smex.org/2010/06/act-now-postpone-the-vote-on-the-e-transactions-law/comment-page-1/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>Lebanon: E-transactions Draft Law Postponed :: Elites TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smex.org/?p=1426#comment-507</guid>
		<description>[...] to discuss the law and prepared to block the vote on Tuesday (June 15). The following day, a public call to actionwas published online and the blogosphere responded. Below are some of the reactions from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to discuss the law and prepared to block the vote on Tuesday (June 15). The following day, a public call to actionwas published online and the blogosphere responded. Below are some of the reactions from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices in English &#187; Lebanon: E-transactions Draft Law Postponed</title>
		<link>http://www.smex.org/2010/06/act-now-postpone-the-vote-on-the-e-transactions-law/comment-page-1/#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices in English &#187; Lebanon: E-transactions Draft Law Postponed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smex.org/?p=1426#comment-505</guid>
		<description>[...] to discuss the law and prepared to block the vote on Tuesday (June 15). The following day, a public call to actionwas published online and the blogosphere responded. Below are some of the reactions from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to discuss the law and prepared to block the vote on Tuesday (June 15). The following day, a public call to actionwas published online and the blogosphere responded. Below are some of the reactions from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firas</title>
		<link>http://www.smex.org/2010/06/act-now-postpone-the-vote-on-the-e-transactions-law/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Firas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smex.org/?p=1426#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s not stereotype! i know some really high-tech 70 years old people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not stereotype! i know some really high-tech 70 years old people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop this law &#124; ritakml</title>
		<link>http://www.smex.org/2010/06/act-now-postpone-the-vote-on-the-e-transactions-law/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop this law &#124; ritakml</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smex.org/?p=1426#comment-473</guid>
		<description>[...] We need you to ACT NOW to stop the E-Transactions law.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We need you to ACT NOW to stop the E-Transactions law.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.smex.org/2010/06/act-now-postpone-the-vote-on-the-e-transactions-law/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smex.org/?p=1426#comment-470</guid>
		<description>I wish you can do something about it, but notice that such a law is only a sequel, didn’t you detect the condition mentioned in the general terms &amp; conditions for DSL users under &quot;Usage of the Service, section 4”, in which the customer agrees not to use the service for any kind of services not authorized by the&quot; Minister of Telecommunication&quot;? So please don’t be stunned, as more restrictions are to follow as long as people give a Minister the right to solely control them according to his own norms and culture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish you can do something about it, but notice that such a law is only a sequel, didn’t you detect the condition mentioned in the general terms &amp; conditions for DSL users under &#8220;Usage of the Service, section 4”, in which the customer agrees not to use the service for any kind of services not authorized by the&#8221; Minister of Telecommunication&#8221;? So please don’t be stunned, as more restrictions are to follow as long as people give a Minister the right to solely control them according to his own norms and culture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

